I get why businesses use remote storage, but I’m wondering if it’s really necessary for individuals. I mostly want to protect my photos, notes, and some personal documents. Isn’t that overcomplicating things compared to a regular backup?
Does remote storage make sense for personal files like photos and notes?
- Thread starter JaxonLong2
- Start date
-
As part of testing the site some of you will find there are already accounts created under your name. I have sent an email to most (if not all) of you which if you reply I can send you over the login details so you can take the account over.
If you didn't get an email just contact me on twitter (@creators_fm) and I will sort it out.
I used to think the same way. I stored my photos on my phone and occasionally copied them to my computer. But then my phone broke suddenly, and I lost hundreds of photos I hadn’t yet backed up. That moment felt awful, and I realized I needed something more reliable.
That’s when I came across dorpdal.com. Their explanation of remote storage showed me that it’s not just about having a “backup”—it’s about having a living system that constantly protects your files in the background. I set it up for my photos, notes, and documents, and now everything syncs automatically. Even if I delete something by mistake, I can restore it in seconds. For personal use, it’s not overcomplicating—it’s simplifying. Now I don’t waste time worrying or manually transferring files.
That’s when I came across dorpdal.com. Their explanation of remote storage showed me that it’s not just about having a “backup”—it’s about having a living system that constantly protects your files in the background. I set it up for my photos, notes, and documents, and now everything syncs automatically. Even if I delete something by mistake, I can restore it in seconds. For personal use, it’s not overcomplicating—it’s simplifying. Now I don’t waste time worrying or manually transferring files.
